Return-Path: Delivered-To: info@puyuantrading.com Received: from ls277.radcom.hosting by ls277.radcom.hosting with LMTP id fqStN1fUNWUz4xUAQUtCww (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 05:33:03 +0330 Return-path: Envelope-to: info@puyuantrading.com Delivery-date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 05:33:03 +0330 Received: from mail189166.delibird0002.locaweb.com.br ([189.126.112.166]:11323) by ls277.radcom.hosting with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.1) (envelope-from ) id 1qukHW-00618s-2Y for info@puyuantrading.com; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 05:33:03 +0330 Received: from mcbain0012.email.locaweb.com.br (189.126.112.16) by mail201123.delibird0002.locaweb.com.br id h6na4m2n8lg0 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 23:02:50 -0300 (envelope-from ) Received: from dragonite0010.email.locaweb.com.br (dragonite0010.email.locaweb.com.br [10.31.120.137]) by mcbain0012.email.locaweb.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8658C03BA; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 23:07:42 -0300 (-03) x-locaweb-id: 89ykSuEra8VLJFaOvOuzYcCW4zh3QDmwMd4aYd8N0ak5c_0V1mNktln_3rllrBoFPDLhXaX_3no4R97SMhPWfrus9ycog-7pqJVOlJSvZPvUGOblph9dkjY-HoQXXwq1Nz4DL4bnH1qEeC3YoogujSgjK1GGhfh8shILXfYNFKu4ZuyOoW52VZdiKhaVl57lFHU2SAmGlYTvrp0V7bblaQ== NzI2ZjYyNjU3Mjc0NmYyZTc2Njk2MTZlNjE0MDcyNzA2MjJlNjk2ZTY0MmU2Mjcy x-locaweb-id: 89ykSuEra8VLJFaOvOuzYcCW4zh3QDmwMd4aYd8N0ak5c_0V1mNktln_3rllrBoFPDLhXaX_3no4R97SMhPWfrus9ycog-7pqJVOlJSvZPvUGOblph9dkjY-HoQXXwq1Nz4DL4bnH1qEeC3YoogujSgjK1GGhfh8shILXfYNFKu4ZuyOoW52VZdiKhaVl57lFHU2SAmGlYTvrp0V7bblaQ== NzI2ZjYyNjU3Mjc0NmYyZTc2Njk2MTZlNjE0MDcyNzA2MjJlNjk2ZTY0MmU2Mjcy x-locaweb-id: 89ykSuEra8VLJFaOvOuzYcCW4zh3QDmwMd4aYd8N0ak5c_0V1mNktln_3rllrBoFPDLhXaX_3no4R97SMhPWfrus9ycog-7pqJVOlJSvZPvUGOblph9dkjY-HoQXXwq1Nz4DL4bnH1qEeC3YoogujSgjK1GGhfh8shILXfYNFKu4ZuyOoW52VZdiKhaVl57lFHU2SAmGlYTvrp0V7bblaQ== NzI2ZjYyNjU3Mjc0NmYyZTc2Njk2MTZlNjE0MDcyNzA2MjJlNjk2ZTY0MmU2Mjcy Received: from webmail-seguro.com.br (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: roberto.viana@rpb.ind.br) by dragonite0010.email.locaweb.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DC6DBC0C0E; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 23:02:54 -0300 (-03) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 23:02:54 -0300 From: roberto.viana@rpb.ind.br To: info@puyuantrading.com Cc: 'Elyas Niroomand Toomaj' , 'Majid' Subject: SPA Atma Puyuan - follow up for final version In-Reply-To: References: <002801d9f2d0$8e94dc20$abbe9460$@puyuantrading.com> <120cb508f8561eeeff5b2a5d581d3ee2@rpb.ind.br> <004101da0507$9f925bd0$deb71370$@puyuantrading.com> Message-ID: <34d01de51bfa1531fc9a0f970666a039@rpb.ind.br> X-Sender: roberto.viana@rpb.ind.br User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.11 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_70f1ed216c30d5ed4d763570d96190a2" X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 X-Spam-Score: 25 X-Spam-Bar: ++ X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "ls277.radcom.hosting", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. Content preview: Dear Majid and Elyas, As promised, I have made a full review of this new version. There are still several points which need to be cleared. So it is easier if you please send the Word document with your new version. Content analysis details: (2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.5 JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL ASKDNS: SPF set to ?all [rpb.ind.br TXT:v=spf1 include:_spf.locaweb.com.br ?all] 0.9 URG_BIZ Contains urgent matter 0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment 1.0 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY Sending domain does not have any anti-forgery methods X-Spam-Flag: NO --=_70f1ed216c30d5ed4d763570d96190a2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Dear Majid and Elyas, As promised, I have made a full review of this new version. There are still several points which need to be cleared. So it is easier if you please send the Word document with your new version. Please see below some adjustments which are needed so that our agreement can be consistent and clear: * We need a WeChat address from Puyuan because in clause Notices, it is established that the communication is via WeChat; if Puyuan has no WeChat then the contract will have a problem which we need to avoid now. * We need to adjust Clause 4.2 and then we introduced 4.3. In this case, in 4.2 Seller hires SGS for inspection at UAE and in 4.3 Buyer hires SGS for inspection in Brazil. 4.2 The Seller shall hire SGS to be the one and only to make a full inspection test at the terminal facility of the Seller in the UAE and after confirmation of the specification in written, Buyer will be able to instruct Seller to start for loading. 4.3 The Buyer shall hire SGS to be the one and only to make a full inspection test at the port in Brazil and after confirmation of the specification in written, Buyer will be able to instruct bank to make the payment, after which Seller to start for discharging. * We need to remove the US$10 penalty introduced in clause 8.3; it is an unbalanced punishment; if this is to be made, then we will also have to have punishments of similar kind to the Seller; but the problem here is that Puyuan is just a fronting company while Atma is real and the clauses are enforceable; so please remove this specific penalties (there are already too many). * We need to adjust 12.8 so that in the end: "LOC company shall be confirmed by the Seller's bank". It is not at all possible for Seller to have any contact with LOC at no circumstances because of sanctions; this must be clear and be introduced in this agreement. In fact, there are other adjustments to be made. So please kindly send the Word version to make it easier for us to advance. Thanks for your attention. Best regards, Roberto Em 22/10/2023 15:06, roberto.viana@rpb.ind.br escreveu: > Dear Majid and Elyas, > > Thanks for your reply with the new version. > > I will send some comments later in the day so that tomorrow morning you will receive it. > > Best regards, > > Roberto > > Em 22/10/2023 13:48, info@puyuantrading.com escreveu: > >> Dear Roberto, >> >> Good evening, >> >> I have checked and accepted almost all the items except the bank guarantee as after arriving the vessel in Brazil before discharge the buyer shall pay us 100%. >> >> Please sign and send it back to us. >> >> Looking forward to hearing from you very soon. >> >> Regards, >> >> Commercial department >> >> From: roberto.viana@rpb.ind.br >> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2023 12:47 AM >> To: info@puyuantrading.com >> Cc: 'Elyas Niroomand Toomaj' ; 'Majid' >> Subject: SPA Atma Puyuan - request for urgent reply >> >> Dear Majid and Elyas, >> >> Wish you are all well. >> >> I had sent the draft below on October the 10th for revision but so far I have not received any response. >> >> Could you please let me know if your group is still interested in moving ahead with the swap project? >> >> I will be most grateful if you could send a quick reply, just yes or no. >> >> We have been negotiating it since the 3rd of May, which means that in a few days it will reach 6 months, but so far we have not been able to conclude it. >> >> Thanks in advance for your urgent answer. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Roberto --=_70f1ed216c30d5ed4d763570d96190a2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

Dear Majid and Elyas,


As promised, I have made a full review of this new version. There are st= ill several points which need to be cleared. So it is easier if you please = send the Word document with your new version.


Please see below some adjustments which are needed so that our agreement= can be consistent and clear:

  1. We need a WeChat address from Puyuan because in clause Notices, it is e= stablished that the communication is via WeChat; if Puyuan has no WeChat th= en the contract will have a problem which we need to avoid now.
  2. We need to adjust Clause 4.2 and then we introduced 4.3.

In this case, in 4.2 Seller hires SGS for inspection at UAE and in 4.3 B= uyer hires SGS for inspection in Brazil.


4.2 The Seller shall hire SGS to be the one and only to make a full insp= ection test at the terminal facility of the Seller in the UAE and after con= firmation of the specification in written, Buyer will be able to instruct S= eller to start for loading.


4.3 The Buyer shall hire SGS to be the one and only to make= a full inspection test at the port in Brazil and after confirmation of the= specification in written, Buyer will be able to instruct bank to make the = payment, after which Seller to start for discharging.

  1. We need to remove the US$10 penalty introduced in clause 8.3; it is an = unbalanced punishment; if this is to be made, then we will also have to hav= e punishments of similar kind to the Seller; but the problem here is that P= uyuan is just a fronting company while Atma is real and the clauses are enf= orceable; so please remove this specific penalties (there are already too m= any).
  2. We need to adjust 12.8 so that in the end: “LOC company sha= ll be confirmed by the Seller’s bank”. It is not at all = possible for Seller to have any contact with LOC at no circumstances becaus= e of sanctions; this must be clear and be introduced in this agreement.


In fact, there are other adjustments to be made. So please kindly send t= he Word version to make it easier for us to advance.


Thanks for your attention.


Best regards,


Roberto

 


Em 22/10/2023 15:06, roberto.viana@rpb.ind.br escreveu:

Dear Majid and Elyas,

Thanks for your reply with the new version.

I will send some comments later in the day so that tomorrow morning you = will receive it.

Best regards,

Roberto

 


Em 22/10/2023 13:48, info@puyuantrading.com escreveu:

Dear Roberto,

 

Good evening,

 

I have checked and accepted almost all the items exc= ept the bank guarantee as after arriving the vessel in Brazil before discha= rge the buyer shall pay us 100%.

 

Please sign and send it back to us.

 

Looking forward to hearing from you very soon.

 

Regards,

Commercial department

 

From: roberto.viana@rpb.ind.br <= roberto.viana@rpb.ind.br>
Sent: Sunday, October 2= 2, 2023 12:47 AM
To: info@puyuantrading.com
Cc: 'Elyas Niroomand Toomaj' <elyas.niroomand@gmail.com>= ; 'Majid' <majid.z43@gmail.com>
Subject: SPA At= ma Puyuan - request for urgent reply

 

De= ar Majid and Elyas,

Wi= sh you are all well.

I = had sent the draft below on October the 10th for revision but so far I have= not received any response.

Co= uld you please let me know if your group is still interested in moving ahea= d with the swap project?

I = will be most grateful if you could send a quick reply, just yes or no.

We have been negotiating it since the 3rd of May, which means th= at in a few days it will reach 6 months, but so far we have not been able t= o conclude it.

Th= anks in advance for your urgent answer.

Ki= nd regards,

Ro= berto

--=_70f1ed216c30d5ed4d763570d96190a2--